Files
Maxim Sobolev afe1dec742 tests: add UFS synchronous write durability tests
Check that once fsync(2), fdatasync(2), or a write(2) with O_SYNC or
O_DSYNC returns, the new data, the file size and every block pointer
leading to the data are on disk.  The cases append a block, fill a hole,
append the first block that needs an indirect block and append below an
existing indirect block.  Two more append after another write left a
new direct block unsynced, which with soft updates cuts the size and the
later pointers of an inode written meanwhile.  With O_SYNC and O_DSYNC
on soft updates, those also check that the open already made the
unsynced block durable.
Each case runs on UFS without soft updates, with soft updates and with
SU+J.

The file systems live on md(4) and the checks read the inode, the
indirect block and the data block straight from the device with libufs
right after the synchronous call returns.  There is no cache in front
of the disk device, so this shows what would survive a crash at that
moment without having to crash anything.

Sponsored by:   Sippy Software, Inc.
Reviewed by:    pho
Tested by:      pho
Differential Revision:  https://reviews.freebsd.org/D60134
MFC after:      1 month
2026-10-12 21:28:32 -07:00
..
…
…

Note: If you modify these files, please keep hier(7) updated!

These files are used to create empty file hierarchies for building the
system into.  Some notes about working with them are placed here to try
and keep them in good working order.

    a)  The files use 4 space indentation, and other than in the header
        comments, should not contain any tabs.  An indentation of 4 is
        preferable to the standard indentation of 8 because the indentation
        of levels in these files can become quite deep causing the line to
        overflow 80 characters.

        This also matches with the files generated when using the
        mtree -c option, which was implemented that way for the same reason.

    b)  Only directories should be listed here.

    c)  The listing should be kept in filename sorted order.

    d)  Sanity checking changes to these files can be done by following
        this procedure (the sed -e is ugly, but fixing mtree -c to
        not emit the trailing white space would be even uglier):

            mkdir /tmp/MTREE
            mtree -deU -f BSD.X.dist -p /tmp/MTREE
            mtree -bcdjn -F freebsd9 -k uname,gname,mode -p /tmp/MTREE | \
                sed -e 's/ *$//' >BSD.X.new
            diff -u BSD.X.dist BSD.X.new
            rm -r /tmp/MTREE

        Note that you will get some differences about /set lines,
        and uname= gname= on certain directory areas, mainly man page
        sections.  This is caused by mtree not having a look ahead
        mechanism for making better selections for these as it
        traverses the hierarchy.

        The BSD.X.new file should NOT be committed, as it will be missing
        the correct header, and important keywords like ``nochange''.
        Simply use the diff for a sanity check to make sure things are in
        the correct order and correctly indented.

    e)  Further sanity checking of the system builds with DESTDIR=/someplace
        are more complicated, but can often catch missing entries in these
        files.  I tend to run this more complete sanity check shortly after
        the target date for a new release is announced.

        If you want details on it bug me about it via email to
        [email protected].