Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2f07ddbd57 docs: xforms_lists: better evaluate struct_group macros ...

The previous approach were to unwind nested structs/unions.

Now that we have a logic that can handle it well, use it to
ensure that struct_group macros will properly reflect the
actual struct.

Note that the replacemend logic still simplifies the code
a little bit, as the basic build block for struct group is:

	union { \
		struct { MEMBERS } ATTRS; \
		struct __struct_group_tag(TAG) { MEMBERS } ATTRS NAME; \
	} ATTRS

There:

- ATTRS is meant to add extra macro attributes like __packed
  which we already discard, as they aren't relevant to
  document struct members;

- TAG is used only when built with __cplusplus.

So, instead, convert them into just:

    struct { MEMBERS };

Please notice that here, we're using the greedy version of the
backrefs, as MEMBERS is actually MEMBERS... on all such macros.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <24bf2c036b08814d9b4aabc27542fd3b2ff54424.1773770483.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

2026-03-22 15:02:29 -06:00

..

abi

docs: kabi: helpers: add documentation for each "enum" value

2026-01-23 11:37:39 -07:00

feat

docs: parse_features: make documentation more consistent

2026-01-23 11:37:39 -07:00

kdoc

docs: xforms_lists: better evaluate struct_group macros

2026-03-22 15:02:29 -06:00

__init__.py

…

jobserver.py

jobserver: Fix typo in docstring

2026-03-17 08:43:39 -06:00

unittest_helper.py

docs: python: add helpers to run unit tests

2026-03-22 15:02:29 -06:00