mirror of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xiang/erofs.git
synced 2026-11-02 23:54:33 +01:00
David Miller
3d9f773cf2
All of these cases are strictly of the form: preempt_disable(); BPF_PROG_RUN(...); preempt_enable(); Replace this with bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu() which wraps BPF_PROG_RUN() with: migrate_disable(); BPF_PROG_RUN(...); migrate_enable(); On non RT enabled kernels this maps to preempt_disable/enable() and on RT enabled kernels this solely prevents migration, which is sufficient as there is no requirement to prevent reentrancy to any BPF program from a preempting task. The only requirement is that the program stays on the same CPU. Therefore, this is a trivially correct transformation. The seccomp loop does not need protection over the loop. It only needs protection per BPF filter program [ tglx: Converted to bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu() ] Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]