erofs-linux/kernel/locking/lockdep_states.h at dev - erofs-linux - Gitea: Git with a cup of tea

imrcpan/erofs-linux

0 Fork 0

mirror of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xiang/erofs.git synced 2026-10-31 14:23:49 +01:00

Files

T

Peter Zijlstra d92a8cfcb3 locking/lockdep: Rework FS_RECLAIM annotation

A while ago someone, and I cannot find the email just now, asked if we
could not implement the RECLAIM_FS inversion stuff with a 'fake' lock
like we use for other things like workqueues etc. I think this should
be possible which allows reducing the 'irq' states and will reduce the
amount of __bfs() lookups we do.

Removing the 1 IRQ state results in 4 less __bfs() walks per
dependency, improving lockdep performance. And by moving this
annotation out of the lockdep code it becomes easier for the mm people
to extend.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Cc: Byungchul Park <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Cc: Nikolay Borisov <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

2017-08-10 12:29:03 +02:00

9 lines

207 B

C

Raw Permalink Blame History

 /*
  * Lockdep states,
  *
  * please update XXX_LOCK_USAGE_STATES in include/linux/lockdep.h whenever
  * you add one, or come up with a nice dynamic solution.
  */
 LOCKDEP_STATE(HARDIRQ)
 LOCKDEP_STATE(SOFTIRQ)