Based on 2 normalized pattern(s):
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as
published by the free software foundation
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as
published by the free software foundation #
extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier
GPL-2.0-only
has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 4122 file(s).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Enrico Weigelt <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Prefer _THIS_IP_ defined in linux/kernel.h.
Most definitions of current_text_addr were the same as _THIS_IP_, but
a few archs had inline assembly instead.
This patch removes the final call site of current_text_addr, making all
of the definitions dead code.
[[email protected]: fix arch/csky/include/asm/processor.h]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Some architectures define the no-op macros/functions copy_segments,
release_segments and forget_segments. These are used nowhere in the
tree, so removed them.
Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <[email protected]> [for arch/arc]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
The only user of thread_saved_pc() in non-arch-specific code was removed
in commit 8243d55977 ("sched/core: Remove pointless printout in
sched_show_task()"). Remove the implementations as well.
Some architectures use thread_saved_pc() in their arch-specific code.
Leave their thread_saved_pc() intact.
Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
For spinning loops people do often use barrier() or cpu_relax().
For most architectures cpu_relax and barrier are the same, but on
some architectures cpu_relax can add some latency.
For example on power,sparc64 and arc, cpu_relax can shift the CPU
towards other hardware threads in an SMT environment.
On s390 cpu_relax does even more, it uses an hypercall to the
hypervisor to give up the timeslice.
In contrast to the SMT yielding this can result in larger latencies.
In some places this latency is unwanted, so another variant
"cpu_relax_lowlatency" was introduced. Before this is used in more
and more places, lets revert the logic and provide a cpu_relax_yield
that can be called in places where yielding is more important than
latency. By default this is the same as cpu_relax on all architectures.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]>
Cc: Noam Camus <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Russell King <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
There was a latent typo in the C6X KSTK_EIP and KSTK_ESP macros which
caused a problem with a new patch which used them. The broken definitions
were of the form:
#define KSTK_FOO(tsk) (task_pt_regs(task)->foo)
Note the use of task vs tsk. This actually worked before because the
only place in the kernel which used these macros passed in a local
pointer named task.
Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <[email protected]>
Thomas Gleixner