While debugging a different issue [1], the following relocation was
noticed in the rust_binder.ko file:
R_AARCH64_CALL26 _RNvXNtNtNtCsdfZWD8DztAw_6kernel4sync4lock8spinlockNtB2_15SpinLockBackendNtB4_7Backend6unlock
This relocation (and a similar one for lock) occurred many times
throughout the module. That is not really useful because all this
function does is call spin_unlock(), so what we actually want here is
that a call to spin_unlock() dirctly is generated in favor of this
wrapper method.
Thus, mark these methods inline.
[boqun: Reword the commit message a bit]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/p/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Almeida <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Rename relative paths inside of the crate to still refer to the same
items, also rename paths inside of the kernel crate and adjust the build
system to build the crate.
[ Remove the `expect` (and thus the `lint_reasons` feature) since
the tree now uses `quote!` from `rust/macros/export.rs`. Remove the
`TokenStream` import removal, since it is now used as well.
In addition, temporarily (i.e. just for this commit) use an `--extern
force:alloc` to prevent an unknown `new_uninit` error in the `rustdoc`
target. For context, please see a similar case in:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
And adjusted the message above. - Miguel ]
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Fiona Behrens <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Andreas Hindborg <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
Since we've exposed Lock::from_raw() and Guard::new() publically, we
want to be able to make sure that we assert that a lock is actually held
when constructing a Guard for it to handle instances of unsafe
Guard::new() calls outside of our lock module.
Hence add a new method assert_is_held() to Backend, which uses lockdep
to check whether or not a lock has been acquired. When lockdep is
disabled, this has no overhead.
[Boqun: Resolve the conflicts with exposing Guard::new(), reword the
commit log a bit and format "unsafe { <statement>; }" into "unsafe {
<statement> }" for the consistency. ]
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Currently FFI integer types are defined in libcore. This commit creates
the `ffi` crate and asks bindgen to use that crate for FFI integer types
instead of `core::ffi`.
This commit is preparatory and no type changes are made in this commit
yet.
Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
[ Added `rustdoc`, `rusttest` and KUnit tests support. Rebased on top of
`rust-next` (e.g. migrated more `core::ffi` cases). Reworded crate
docs slightly and formatted. - Miguel ]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
Rust's `unused_imports` lint covers both unused and redundant imports.
In the upcoming 1.78.0, the lint detects more cases of redundant imports
[1], e.g.:
error: the item `bindings` is imported redundantly
--> rust/kernel/print.rs:38:9
|
38 | use crate::bindings;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the item `bindings` is already defined by prelude
Most cases are `use crate::bindings`, plus a few other items like `Box`.
Thus clean them up.
Note that, in the `bindings` case, the message "defined by prelude"
above means the extern prelude, i.e. the `--extern` flags we pass.
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117772 [1]
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
Currently, all macros are reexported with #[macro_export] only, which
means that to access `new_work!` from the workqueue, you need to import
it from the path `kernel::new_work` instead of importing it from the
workqueue module like all other items in the workqueue. By adding
reexports of the macros, it becomes possible to import the macros from
the correct modules.
It's still possible to import the macros from the root, but I don't
think we can do anything about that.
There is no functional change. This is merely a code cleanliness
improvement.
Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Boqun Feng <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
[ Removed new `use kernel::prelude::*`s, reworded title. ]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
Some of our links use relative paths in order to point to files in the
source tree, e.g.:
//! C header: [`include/linux/printk.h`](../../../../include/linux/printk.h)
/// [`struct mutex`]: ../../../../include/linux/mutex.h
These are problematic because they are hard to maintain and do not support
`O=` builds.
Instead, provide support for `srctree`-relative links, e.g.:
//! C header: [`include/linux/printk.h`](srctree/include/linux/printk.h)
/// [`struct mutex`]: srctree/include/linux/mutex.h
The links are fixed after `rustdoc` generation to be based on the absolute
path to the source tree.
Essentially, this is the automatic version of Tomonori's fix [1],
suggested by Gary [2].
Suggested-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Reported-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[email protected]>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] [1]
Fixes: 48fadf4400 ("docs: Move rustdoc output, cross-reference it")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20231026154525.6d14b495@eugeo/ [2]
Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
Rust documentation tests are going to be build/run-tested
with the KUnit integration added in a future patch, thus
update them to make them compilable/testable so that we
may start enforcing it.
Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Björn Roy Baron <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
Alice Ryhl