locking/osq: Relax atomic semantics

... by using acquire/release for ops around the lock->tail. As such,
weakly ordered archs can benefit from more relaxed use of barriers
when issuing atomics.

Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Waiman Long <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
Davidlohr Bueso authored and Ingo Molnar committed 2015-09-18 09:27:29 +02:00
1 parent 6e1e519697
commit c55a6ffa62
1 file changed
+8 -3
+8 -3
View File
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ osq_wait_next(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock,
for (;;) {
if (atomic_read(&lock->tail) == curr &&
atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->tail, curr, old) == curr) {
atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->tail, curr, old) == curr) {
/*
* We were the last queued, we moved @lock back. @prev
* will now observe @lock and will complete its
@@ -92,7 +92,11 @@ bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock)
node->next = NULL;
node->cpu = curr;
old = atomic_xchg(&lock->tail, curr);
/*
* ACQUIRE semantics, pairs with corresponding RELEASE
* in unlock() uncontended, or fastpath.
*/
old = atomic_xchg_acquire(&lock->tail, curr);
if (old == OSQ_UNLOCKED_VAL)
return true;
@@ -184,7 +188,8 @@ void osq_unlock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock)
/*
* Fast path for the uncontended case.
*/
if (likely(atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->tail, curr, OSQ_UNLOCKED_VAL) == curr))
if (likely(atomic_cmpxchg_release(&lock->tail, curr,
OSQ_UNLOCKED_VAL) == curr))
return;
/*