perf/hw_breakpoint: Split attribute parse and commit

arch_validate_hwbkpt_settings() mixes up attribute check and commit into
a single code entity. Therefore the validation may return an error due to
incorrect atributes while still leaving halfway modified architecture
breakpoint data.

This is harmless when we deal with a new breakpoint but it becomes a
problem when we modify an existing breakpoint.

Split attribute parse and commit to fix that. The architecture is
passed a "struct arch_hw_breakpoint" to fill on top of the new attr
and the core takes care about copying the backend data once it's fully
validated. The architectures then need to implement the new API.

Original-patch-by: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Cc: Chris Zankel <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Max Filippov <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Rich Felker <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c

@@ -400,16 +400,35 @@ int dbg_release_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int validate_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp)
+#ifndef hw_breakpoint_arch_parse
+int hw_breakpoint_arch_parse(struct perf_event *bp,
+			     const struct perf_event_attr *attr,
+			     struct arch_hw_breakpoint *hw)
 {
-	int ret;
+	int err;
 
-	ret = arch_validate_hwbkpt_settings(bp);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+	err = arch_validate_hwbkpt_settings(bp);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	*hw = bp->hw.info;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
+static int hw_breakpoint_parse(struct perf_event *bp,
+			       const struct perf_event_attr *attr,
+			       struct arch_hw_breakpoint *hw)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	err = hw_breakpoint_arch_parse(bp, attr, hw);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
 
 	if (arch_check_bp_in_kernelspace(bp)) {
-		if (bp->attr.exclude_kernel)
+		if (attr->exclude_kernel)
 			return -EINVAL;
 		/*
 		 * Don't let unprivileged users set a breakpoint in the trap
@@ -424,19 +443,22 @@ static int validate_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp)
 
 int register_perf_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp)
 {
-	int ret;
+	struct arch_hw_breakpoint hw;
+	int err;
 
-	ret = reserve_bp_slot(bp);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+	err = reserve_bp_slot(bp);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
 
-	ret = validate_hw_breakpoint(bp);
-
-	/* if arch_validate_hwbkpt_settings() fails then release bp slot */
-	if (ret)
+	err = hw_breakpoint_parse(bp, &bp->attr, &hw);
+	if (err) {
 		release_bp_slot(bp);
+		return err;
+	}
 
-	return ret;
+	bp->hw.info = hw;
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -464,6 +486,7 @@ modify_user_hw_breakpoint_check(struct perf_event *bp, struct perf_event_attr *a
 	u64 old_len  = bp->attr.bp_len;
 	int old_type = bp->attr.bp_type;
 	bool modify  = attr->bp_type != old_type;
+	struct arch_hw_breakpoint hw;
 	int err = 0;
 
 	bp->attr.bp_addr = attr->bp_addr;
@@ -473,7 +496,7 @@ modify_user_hw_breakpoint_check(struct perf_event *bp, struct perf_event_attr *a
 	if (check && memcmp(&bp->attr, attr, sizeof(*attr)))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	err = validate_hw_breakpoint(bp);
+	err = hw_breakpoint_parse(bp, attr, &hw);
 	if (!err && modify)
 		err = modify_bp_slot(bp, old_type);
 
@@ -484,7 +507,9 @@ modify_user_hw_breakpoint_check(struct perf_event *bp, struct perf_event_attr *a
 		return err;
 	}
 
+	bp->hw.info = hw;
 	bp->attr.disabled = attr->disabled;
+
 	return 0;
 }