arm64/sve: Make kernel FPU protection RT friendly

Non RT kernels need to protect FPU against preemption and bottom half
processing. This is achieved by disabling bottom halves via
local_bh_disable() which implictly disables preemption.

On RT kernels this protection mechanism is not sufficient because
local_bh_disable() does not disable preemption. It serializes bottom half
related processing via a CPU local lock.

As bottom halves are running always in thread context on RT kernels
disabling preemption is the proper choice as it implicitly prevents bottom
half processing.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>

arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c

@@ -237,10 +237,19 @@ static void __get_cpu_fpsimd_context(void)
  *
  * The double-underscore version must only be called if you know the task
  * can't be preempted.
+ *
+ * On RT kernels local_bh_disable() is not sufficient because it only
+ * serializes soft interrupt related sections via a local lock, but stays
+ * preemptible. Disabling preemption is the right choice here as bottom
+ * half processing is always in thread context on RT kernels so it
+ * implicitly prevents bottom half processing as well.
  */
 static void get_cpu_fpsimd_context(void)
 {
-	local_bh_disable();
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
+		local_bh_disable();
+	else
+		preempt_disable();
 	__get_cpu_fpsimd_context();
 }
 
@@ -261,7 +270,10 @@ static void __put_cpu_fpsimd_context(void)
 static void put_cpu_fpsimd_context(void)
 {
 	__put_cpu_fpsimd_context();
-	local_bh_enable();
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
+		local_bh_enable();
+	else
+		preempt_enable();
 }
 
 static bool have_cpu_fpsimd_context(void)